There's this hardened journalistic truism: "If your mother says she loves you,Asian movies Archives check it out." In other words: Don't believe what people say until you verify it.
Lately, it seems like TikTok has taken this ethos to heart — and it really needs to stop. All kinds of "test" trends for partners, friends, and loved ones have taken off. It feels at best icky and at worst unfair and mean to people you're supposed to care for. In short: Don't use closeness for clout.
The latest trend is the so-called "Bird Test." Basically, the idea is to point out something innocuous — "Hey, look at that bird out there" — and see if the person joins in on your interest. Here's a TikTok from @alyssacardib explaining it in detail.
I can see how there's some merit to this idea. It's nice to have a romantic partner, friend, or loved one get involved in your curiosity. It's great to share interests, and some of life's finest moments involve outsized enthusiasm over small things. But what leaves me cold is the idea that you do this to test someone. Even the relatively benign explainer from @alyssacardib positions the Bird Test as a significant "sign" of whether the relationship will work. Imagine: The love of your life is really engrossed in an email and, for a moment, isn't interested in a woodpecker. Well, guess that's it.
Listen, though, I get it. We all want "signs" for who should be in our lives. That would be convenient. To wit: Here's a cute video of a guy "passing" the Bird Test.
But do you know what's a better indicator if someone in a relationship shows the proper interest in your life? If that person, over time and with intention, shows goddamn interest in your issues, thoughts, problems, and curiosities. A partnership or friendship cannot and should not be broken down to a finite moment in order to siphon views on TikTok. Testing your partner over a blue jay — for TikTok, no less — is gross. I would encourage breaking up with someone because they regularly write off your simple moments of joy — e.g. seeing a cool bird — but it leans toward unfair and manipulative the second you start filming a single instance for strangers on TikTok.
SEE ALSO: TikTokkers put their partners to 'The Beckham Test'And the Bird Test is far from the only viral "test" on TikTok. It has become an entire genre on the platform. There's the "Water" dance test where (typically) women test their (typically) male partners to see if their head turns to a TikTok sound typically accompanied by a sexual dance. There's the Beckham Test, where you play "Islands in the Stream" in your kitchen and see if your partner dances with you, à la Victoria and David Beckham in a recent Netflix documentary. There was asking your male partner how much they thought about the Roman Empire.
Want more sex and dating storiesin your inbox? Sign up for Mashable's new weekly After Dark newsletter.
This obsession with testing our partners gets at our most basic human instincts. We're pattern-seeking animals, and the idea that one decision can extrapolate out to an entire relationship is attractive. It's like a get-rich-quick scheme but for love — You Won't Believe This One Trick That'll Show Whether Your Partner Will Love You Forever. That's a generous reading of these "test" trends, though. A less generous POV is that folks are setting up loved ones to potential public ridicule for a few views on TikTok.
SEE ALSO: The best dating apps for women to fall in love, find a plus one, or end a dry spellEither way, these test trends should stop. A trusting relationship — be it romantic or otherwise — deserves more respect than a minute-long TikTok clip testing its strength. So what's worse than not passing the Bird Test on TikTok? Doing it to your partner at all.
Topics TikTok
Fan who wrote to Dave Chappelle picks apart transgender jokesVolvo's first electricObama is attempting to restore our faith in humanity before 2018. Bless.We tried the Kraft mac and cheese ice cream flavor: reviewApple quietly releases MagSafe Battery Pack for iPhone 12How to share your screen on Zoom'Loki' will be back for more mischief in Season 2Death and Donald Trump lead Wikipedia's top searches of 2017'Never Have I Ever' Season 2 leans in to Devi's imperfectionsKid's super deep response to classroom riddle is way better than the actual answerTrump reportedly to ban staff from using personal cellphones'Make America Gay Again' banner welcomes Mike Pence outside his vacation homeMitt Romney changed his location on Twitter, and that's bad news for Donald TrumpHow to keep your Slack status 'active' while 'working' from homeHow to keep your Slack status 'active' while 'working' from home15 timeless tweets to celebrate Twitter's 15th anniversaryFan who wrote to Dave Chappelle picks apart transgender jokesYou can call scrunchies 'hair clouds' now if you wantTrump reportedly to ban staff from using personal cellphones'Schmigadoon!' is a goofy delight for musical fans: Apple TV+ review Cynthia Macdonald, 1928–2015 by Dan Piepenbring Solving Agatha Christie’s Mysteries with Data Read Adam LeFevre’s “Ethics,” A Poem About a Pet Brick Donald Justice’s “There Is a Gold Light in Certain Old Paintings” by John Jeremiah Sullivan Notes on Unreadable Books Is It Possible to Be a Conscientious Travel Writer? Hunter S. Thompson Rides with the Hells Angels Benjamin Moser on Clarice Lispector’s Complete Stories Coming Soon: “The Unprofessionals,” A New Anthology Staff Picks: Amy Gerstler, Barton Swaim, Matthew Gavin Frank Still Lifes Capture the Evolution of the Watermelon The “Romance” of Travel: Joseph Roth’s Hotel Years The Lost Tribes of Tierra del Fuego China Has Ripped Off Anish Kapoor’s “Bean” Sculpture Murakami’s “Kafka on the Shore” Comes to the Stage Is This a Photo of the Brontë Sisters? Probably Not. The Horror of Philosophy, the Philosophy of Horror Look: Richard Brautigan’s Poetry Inspires Techno “Coke,” a Poem by Scott Cohen Documenting the Doo
2.1806s , 8224.921875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Asian movies Archives】,Charm Information Network