There's a lot to like about Samsung's newly announced Galaxy S8 and The Impotent King (2005) in English SubtitlesS8+, like the gorgeous "Infinity" displays, faster performance, improved selfie camera. Hell, there's even a headphone jack!
But can we talk about the fingerprint sensor for a minute? More specifically, the awful, terrible place Samsung decided to relocate it to.
SEE ALSO: Say hi to Samsung Bixby, the new voice assistant in the Galaxy S8I'd be lying if I said I didn't know it was coming. Thanks to a steady flow of high-resolution leaked images that made their way onto the internet over the last few months, we've known for some time that the S8 wouldn't have a fingerprint sensor/home button on the front.
Samsung's explanation is simple: To make room for a larger display with an 83 percent screen-to-body ratio, the fingerprint sensor had to be go.
With no space on the thin bottom bezel to house a fingerprint sensor/home button, Samsung really didn't have many options left.
It could have removed the fingerprint sensor altogether, but that would have been a step backwards for phone security and would have broken Samsung Pay, which uses a person's fingerprint to authenticate credit card transactions.
I'm annoyed at precisely where Samsung decided to put it: off-center, next to the camera.
Another option would have been to embed the fingerprint sensor underneath the display. And while that might have been the original plan, a report from The Investorpublished in early March said Samsung had to abandon this idea because Synaptics, the company it had poured resources into helping develop the tech, "ran out of time" to make it happen for the S8.
With both of the above not really options, Samsung basically had no choice but to put the fingerprint sensor on the back.
I'm not upset the fingerprint sensor is on the back. I'm annoyed at precisely whereSamsung decided to put it: off-center, next to the 12-megapixel camera. You don't need to ever touch the S8 to picture how terrible this is.
As I've said before, I'm fine with rear-positioned fingerprint sensors. Lots of Android phones, like the Google Pixels and LG G6, have the sensors on the back. But they get it right and have them dead center – exactly where your index finger rests or can naturally move to.
On the S8 and S8+, you've got to reach your index finger up towards the left, past the camera, to get to the fingerprint sensor. And if you've got smaller hands, you're definitely going to need to shimmy the phone down in your palm to access it. It's not easy or intuitive.
The biggest problem is, of course, how smudged up the rear camera lens will get from your finger if you miss and touch it instead. Because you willmiss. I did a few mock fingerprint unlock tests and missed more than 50 percent of the time. Better keep a micro-fiber cloth handy unless you want blurry photos.
Samsung gets around needing to use the fingerprint sensor too much by including facial recognition and iris scanner unlock options, but neither work with Samsung Pay.
You may be reading this and thinking I'm overreacting, but I'm most definitely not. It's the little things that matter and add up to phone experience that's either great or sucks. Though the fingerprint sensor's odd position doesn't necessarily ruin the S8, it's still frustrating to see Samsung accept such a frustrating compromise. I might be more forgiving if this was a design choice on one of Samsung's midrange or budget phones, but the S8 is a premium phone, and in 2017 that means getting all the details right.
Topics Android Cybersecurity Samsung
Emmys 2017 Red Carpet looks: Stranger Things and moreSo ... what is Jennifer Lawrence's 'mother!' really about?You can now disable Samsung's Bixby buttonThe internet had some strong feelings about Sofia Vergara's son at the EmmysWhiskey, Alexa, and me: A night alone in the woods with digital assistantsEmmys 2017 winners: Full listApple is introducing fast charging for the iPhone X ... but you'll have to pay extra for itInsane Clown Posse's Juggalo March takes to the D.C. National Mall, and the photos are epicThe worst pumpkin foods (even if you like pumpkin)After 50 years of history, Rolling Stone is up for saleJamie Lee Curtis returns to her iconic 'Halloween' role, 40 years laterAfter Irma, Barbuda's 300You can finally "snooze" annoying people on FacebookThere's a sexy 'Fake News' costume and Halloween isn't even real anymoreSo, that viral 'hot cop' seems to have a soft spot for antiWhat the iPhone X means for the iPhone 11Beware of fake forecasts for Hurricane Jose'mother!' gets a rare F grade from CinemaScore, but what does that really mean?'Outlander' says a heartbreaking goodbye to the Highlanders in our Cry of the WeekThe worst pumpkin foods (even if you like pumpkin) The real star of the Tony Awards was this goat 'Death Stranding' gameplay and Norman Reedus weirdness at E3: Watch Telltale Games is working on a 'Stranger Things' adventure game Elon Musk announces companywide Tesla layoffs 'Sekiro' feels like 'Dark Souls' wrapped up in an Akira Kurosawa film All the big trailers from Bethesda's E3 2018 showcase: Watch PSA: Instagram Story emoji sliders are not anonymous When are we going to get honest What E3 told us about the next Xbox and game streaming All the best trailers from Nintendo's E3 2018 showcase: Watch Microsoft Office is getting a simpler, cleaner look Everything the eerie 'Hereditary' gets right about grief NASA's Opportunity rover is braving an extreme dust storm on Mars Vivo NEX is what you wanted the iPhone X to be Joseph Gordon Google Translate is using AI to power a robust offline mode What is the Age of Heroes: Everything we know about 'Game of Thrones' prequel era Bitcoin and Ethereum plummet after Coinrail hack Amazon Prime discounts for Whole Foods stores spread to 10 more states The fastest supercomputer belongs to the US again
2.2023s , 10131.828125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【The Impotent King (2005) in English Subtitles】,Charm Information Network