A heartbreaker of a vote just went down in the U.S. Senate with disturbing implications for online privacy.
On Wednesday,TV Movie Archives the Senate failed to pass an amendment to parts of the Patriot Act that would explicitly prevent law enforcement from using it to justify collecting individuals' internet browser and search history without a warrant.
The failure of the amendment means your searches and the URLs you look at could be swept up in the same sort of warrantless mass surveillance that Edward Snowden exposed in 2013, although back then it involved telephone metadata.
The most crushing part? It failed by just one vote.
The amendment required 60 votes to pass, and got 59, including votes from 24 Republicans. However, 10 Democrats voted against the amendment, dooming it and some internet freedoms to the congressional trash bin.
Some internet privacy advocates are encouraged by the fact that 59 senators sought to protect our privacy, but stymied by why the 10 Democrats sided with Sen. Mitch McConnell.
"The 10 Democrats who voted no on the amendment is inexplicable and frankly indefensible," Sean Vitka, senior policy counsel for Demand Progress, a progressive internet freedoms organization, told Mashable.
"Ten democrats just voted to let Bill Barr and Donald Trump access internet browsing and search history without a warrant."
"Ten democrats just voted to let Bill Barr and Donald Trump access internet browsing and search history without a warrant," he said. "What else is there to say? There can be no explanation for why they voted this way, except for cynical political reasons."
Usually progressive Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Sheldon Whitehouse were among the 10 Democrats who voted Nay. Sen. Bernie Sanders was not present for the vote.
Sen. Ron Wyden, the sponsor of the amendment, tweeted a similar sentiment about how close the vote was — and the gravity of the consequences.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Congress is currently attempting to reauthorize three controversial portions of the Patriot Act that require approval every four years. A recent review of surveillance processes found that some of these sections were being exploited to justify warrantless surveillance— including of Republican Trump consultant Cater Paige. That may have inspired some Republicans to take a greater interest in internet privacy, according to Vitka.
Unfortunately, the Daily Beast reports that it has also spurred McConnell to expand the surveillance authority of the Patriot Act, protecting politicians and suspected foreign operatives from surveillance, while leaving other Americans and protected groups (like religious organizations and journalists) out in the cold.
The consequences of the Wyden amendment vote are still unknown. Vitka explained that the part of the Patriot Act, Section 215, which justified the mass warrantless collection of telephone metadata in the past, is broad and vague. The Wyden amendment would have prevented law enforcement from using Section 215 to justify the warrantless collection of internet history. However, just because the amendment failed, does not mean that the practice is explicitly allowed. The amendment's failure essentially creates more of a gray area.
"We failed to protect the collection of internet activity with a warrant," Vitka said. "What the government thinks it can do with the status quo, honestly we don’t know, and I have more questions than I had yesterday."
Topics Cybersecurity Privacy Politics
Elon Musk's Father's Day was all sciThis airline gave a free lifetime pass to a baby born midHere's why NASA keeps postponing its really cool mission to make glowing cloudsAirbus project Vahana shows how to hail an autonomous flying taxiJay Z calls out bail bond industry in Father's Day columnFamily's matching tTwitter's 2Forget driving to the supermarket, this one wants to come to you insteadTwitter's 2Google posts Financial Times opGerman court lashes out at Google over the 'right to be forgotten'Remembering Leonard Nimoy looks at the full life and private struggle of a beloved actorCongrats to Katy Perry on hitting 100 million Twitter followers — most of which are botsFrance plans for conductorless 'drone trains' on tracks by 2023Elon Musk had a 'promising' conversation about tunnels with Los Angeles mayorIs video really the future of VR?Here's why NASA keeps postponing its really cool mission to make glowing cloudsI can't be basic on Instagram anymore and it's all because of StoriesJay Z drops a snippet of 'Adnis' from his mysterious new album '4:44'Elon Musk's Father's Day was all sci Grammys 2017: 5 things to know about this year's nominees All of San Francisco tried to buy 'Hamilton' tickets and pretty much failed Get thee to a TV and watch Russell Westbrook play NBA basketball Drones capture first wintry wonderland weekend in the Midwest Mansplainers, you can go home now — J.K. Rowling has spoken The first photo from a new Earth Please, please, please stop calling white nationalists 'hipsters' 'Game of Thrones' actor Peter Vaughan dies at 93 Explainer: What are MMX, SSE, and AVX? Election, Olympics and Pokemon top the year's Twitter trends Little boy decorated his entire kitchen with carrots Christmas lights are the only way to accessorize your beard this season The return of this quiz So, that happened: Al Gore meets with Donald and Ivanka Trump on climate YouTube says all those ads you watch are worth it Meet LiLou, the therapy pig here to make you feel better about flying A startup is turning beer leftovers into gourmet granola bars This photo sums up how much the world has changed in 2016 'The Last Guardian' is a half Netflix will now show you video previews to help cure your indecision
1.902s , 8226.09375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【TV Movie Archives】,Charm Information Network