UPDATE: Dec. 18,Dubbed 2024, 11:36 a.m. EST This story was updated after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear challenges on the TikTok ban.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) formally appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to block the expected TikTok ban, which looms over the social media company as January approaches. Meanwhile, TikTok had made its own case for intervention — and the court has now responded to the call.
"The Constitution imposes an extraordinarily high bar on this kind of mass censorship. The Supreme Court should take up this important case and protect the rights of millions of Americans to freely express themselves and engage with others around the world," wrote deputy director of ACLU’s National Security Project Patrick Toomey in the appeal. The amicus brief was submitted on Dec. 17 by the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.
On Dec. 18, the U.S. Supreme Court formally agreed to hear challenges filed by TikTok and ByteDance, with oral arguments scheduled for Jan. 10.
TikTok and its allies have called the ban a violation of the First Amendment right to free speech, and the company has consistently denied any connections to Chinese government intelligence or the sharing of American users' data, which is the leading justification for the forced divestment of TikTok from Chinese ownership.
SEE ALSO: Get ready for these scams in 2025Barring a decision by the highest court, the ban, signed by President Biden in April, will go into effect Jan. 19. TikTok could have divested from its parent company, ByteDance, to comply with the law and halt an outright ban, but it had resisted any sale, most likely pending another court decision. Earlier this week, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied an emergency injunction submitted by TikTok that would delay the ban's effect until the Supreme Court could render an opinion under strict scrutiny. The Appeals court argued that highest scrutiny had been reached, and that national security interests justified the U.S. government's action.
The ACLU and its partners argued the court's reasoning was incorrect. "The D.C. Circuit failed to fully address the law’s profound implications for the First Amendment rights of the 170 million Americans who use TikTok," wrote the ACLU. "While the lower court’s decision correctly recognized that the statute triggers First Amendment scrutiny, it barely addressed users’ First Amendment interests in speaking, sharing, and receiving information on the platform. The court also perplexingly attempted to cast the government’s ban on TikTok as a vindication of users’ First Amendment rights, which it is not."
The ACLU has retained that the TikTok ban is a violation of federally protected rights, including free speech, calling the forceable sale "unconstitutional" in a statement released in March. A few months prior the civil rights organization argued that a ban on any such social media app would be "a dangerous act of censorship."
"Restricting citizens’ access to foreign media is a practice that has long been associated with repressive regimes," wrote Jameel Jaffer, executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, "and we should be very wary of letting the practice take root here."
Topics Social Good TikTok Politics
Didactic Seuss, and Other News by Sadie SteinTender Spirits: A Conversation with MarieBovary and the City by Sadie SteinBeauty in a HoleSharon Olds, “Diagnosis” by Sadie SteinGetting Caught by Drew BratcherThe NYRB Fiftieth Anniversary Kickoff, in Tweets by Sadie SteinConsequently, I Rejoice by Sadie SteinVirginia Woolf, on Pancakes and Porridge by Sadie SteinDear Enemy by Sadie SteinVanity of Vanities by Sadie SteinKid Gloves by Michael McGrathAllen Ginsberg Snaps, and Other News by Sadie SteinWhat We’re Loving: Fires, Isolation, Whispering Gallery by The Paris ReviewOffsides, Part 2 by David GendelmanEdith Wharton by Design by Jason DiamondFor Reference by Sadie Stein“Things GrownEdith Wharton by Design by Jason DiamondWhat We’re Loving: Carson, Hatterr, Fidel by The Paris Review Game of Thrones opening credits change to possible clue Watch Gal Gadot's thunderous Hall H return at Comic Marvel's 'The Defenders' season premiere review iPhone 9's L Disastrous 'Pokémon Go' Fest ends with anger and refunds Gwendoline Christie explains why Brienne is still following Catelyn Stark's orders Bran Stark may have just revealed the Three Helpful new app connects breastfeeding moms with specialists 24/7 11 career moves for Sean Spicer now that all else has failed 'Justice League' stars pick out their perfect 'Suicide Squad' nemeses Not even Prince William and Kate can get 'Game of Thrones' actors to give them spoilers Delta passengers out of this airport can use a fingerprint to board People are playing Harry Potter I deleted the Facebook app and I haven't looked back You can help NASA out during this summer's solar eclipse Microsoft's chatbot Zo doesn't really like Windows Navy SEALS and other real 'Walking Dead' trailer seems to confirm major fan theory about Rick Where’s Superman in that ‘Justice League’ trailer? Game of Thrones Episode 3: Dany and Jon meet in 'The Queen's Justice'