Update,Busty Coeds vs Lusty Cheerleaders (2011) Friday, April 27, 1:24 pm ET:The San Jose Mercury News identified the genealogy website used by investigatorsas GEDmatch, a free, open-source service based in Florida.
Think twice before you send companies your spit.
A suspected serial killer was caught when investigators compared his DNA to samples collected by an ancestry website.
SEE ALSO: Facebook's richer than ever, despite data privacy scandalsServices like 23andMe and Ancestry have become popular by using DNA from users who want to learn more about their family history. But few people think the DNA samples they send in might be used by law enforcement.
On Tuesday, Joseph James DeAngelo Jr. was caught by police. He's allegedly the "Golden State Killer," the perpetrator of 45 rapes and 12 murders throughout the '70s and '80s.
Obviously, if he's guilty, this guy should burn in the hottest of hells. In the wake of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, though, thewayhe was caught does raise some privacy questions.
Law enforcement compared a blood sample from the scene of a crime with DNA from one of DeAngelo's relatives, according to the Sacramento Bee. That's right. He wasn't even the one who used the ancestry website —it was someone who was related to him.
That means you don't even have to consent to have your DNA available to law enforcement.
The Sacramento District Attorney's Office confirmed that the Bee's story was accurate, but wouldn't name the ancestry websites used by investigators to track down DeAngelo.
"It’s an ongoing investigation," Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Grippi said in a statement provided to Mashable. "We have given you as much information as we can at this time. No further information on this subject will be provided."
Spokespeople from 23andMe and Ancestry said the companies were not involved in the DeAngelo case.
The former said it's "our policy to resist law enforcement inquiries to protect customer privacy." Ancestry said it "advocates for its members’ privacy and will not share any information with law enforcement unless compelled to by valid legal process."
There are other genealogy websites out there that collect DNA, but 23andMe and Ancestry are the most visible of those services — and they absolutely get requests from law enforcement for data.
Both release transparency reports. 23andMe claims it has never shared genetic information with law enforcement. Ancestry says it hasn't over the last three years, but did share data in 2014 with investigators looking into the murder and rape of a woman in Idaho.
Last year, Sen. Chuck Schumer called on the Federal Trade Commission to look into how companies that collect your DNA store and share your data.
"Now, this is sensitive information," he said, "and what those companies can do with all that data, our sensitive and deepest information, your genetics, is not clear and in some cases not fair and not right."
Topics Cybersecurity Privacy
Study trains Port Jackson sharks to respond to jazz music
What We’re Loving: Toomer, Kusama, and Train by The Paris Review
Watch: How a Book Is Made, 1947 by Sadie Stein
The activists fighting algorithms for a more just and equitable future
Trump tariff news: See the latest impacts on consumer tech
Character.AI: What it is and how to use it
Gen Z is challenging the way we date, says Tinder report
Austen's Ring, Hemingway's Endings by Sadie Stein
5 Affordable Last
Dance to the Music of Time: Tacita Dean at the New Museum by Joanne McNeil
Best smartwatch deal: Save 44% on CMF Watch Pro for $38.90 at Amazon
Tinder launches apocalyptic Swipe Night experience in the UK and around the world
Home to Darkness: An Interview with Playwright Tom Murphy by Belinda McKeon
Drama, Tantrums, and Bird
Sunday's Fat Bear Week match pits two fat favorites against each other
Meta slapped with $1.3 billion fine for sending EU user data to the U.S.
Coitus More Ferarum in Game of Thrones (NSFW)
It looks like OnePlus is getting ready to finally launch a smartwatch
'Black Mirror' Season 7: 'Hotel Reverie,' explained
On Uncle Vanya: Part 1 by Clancy Martin
No Life Lost: The World of Berlinde De BruyckerePuzzle Deadline Extended on Grounds of Extreme Difficulty!Umberto Eco: “How to Travel with a Salmon”Watching the NBA AllWho Is Professor Bhaer? Part 3 of an Ongoing InvestigationNow Online: Our Interviews with Eileen Myles and Jane SmileyOur New Spring Issue: Interviews with Luc Sante, Robert CaroThe Strange, Working Romance of Fritz Lang and Thea von HarbouFavorite Recipes of Famous WomenThe Long Quest to Authenticate a “Maltese Falcon” StatuetteAt Last, We Answer Patricia Lockwood's Excellent TweetThis Is (Literally) the World’s Tiniest BookFavorite Recipes of Famous WomenUmberto Eco: “How to Travel with a Salmon”In France, Rereading Old DiariesThe Perils of Sadie Hawkins Day (When Your Name Is Sadie)The Answers to Our Thirty Word PuzzlesHoney! Who Would’ve Thought?Staff Picks: Bissell, Panter, Aridjis, KrasznahorkaiHoney! Who Would’ve Thought? The Black Album by Rowan Ricardo Phillips The Known Unknown: On Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky Smut by Sadie Stein O Canada by Sadie Stein Fourth Wall by Sadie Stein In the Darkroom with W. Eugene Smith Conversing with Brodsky, and Other News by Sadie Stein Recapping Dante: Canto 5, or A Note on the Translation by Alexander Aciman Notes from a Bookshop: Early Autumn, or Winter’s Coming by Kelly McMasters Modern Austen, and Other News by Sadie Stein A Downright Incantation by Sadie Stein The Book Thieves, and Other News by Sadie Stein Ivor Gurney’s “To His Love” by Glyn Maxwell Underthings, and Other News by Sadie Stein Actual Size by Sadie Stein Have You Seen This Desk? by Sadie Stein In Conversation by John Freeman Twiggy and the Gang by Yona Zeldis McDonough What We Talk About When We Talk About Ill What We’re Loving: Baseball, Giacometti, Literary Sprinting by The Paris Review
2.184s , 8225.9765625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Busty Coeds vs Lusty Cheerleaders (2011)】,Charm Information Network